5 Nov 2012

Greed is good. Sometimes.

Remember Gordon Gekko's "greed is good" speech? It's funny that economists have always considered it an innocent statement of the importance of self-interest, while most of the rest of the world have associated it with ruthless selfishness, social darwinism and ripping off neighbors.

The necessary (?) clarification that we need to keep in mind during this season of electing leaders and voting on laws is that these ideas can be reconciled by noting that "greed is good" WHEN:
  • Rules protect the innocent against greed from (white and blue) collar theft. These same rules -- the rule of law, in other words -- make it possible to earn and accumulate wealth.

  • A safety net ensures that the wealth produced by greed is partially redistributed to protect those without the wits or the luck to do well. Taxes fund common pool goods like social insurance (unemployment, health, education) and infrastructure (roads, police, fire, courts, etc.) that help people "build that." I prefer simple taxes that are not distorted by lobbyists and legal clauses -- like property taxes.

  • Government functions support the creation and trading of private goods without dictating what those are. Consumerism that increases the demand for resources is not great, but it can be troublesome when consumption produces negative externalities.
Bottom Line: Greed is good but don't steal.


Robpublican said...

I'm really curious about property taxes as an alternative to the US tax code. On the one hand, taxing wealth seems far more fair than taxing income. The difficulty will always come down to how you define wealth. Right now, how we define income contributes to the inequitable taxation that allows billionaires to pay a lower net rate than the middle class.

I've seen plenty to make me believe that we would have exactly the same problem if we were to switch to property taxes. Once the money is there, the lobbyists will descend and we will likely end up in just as big a mess as we are in now. Wealth, or property values will be calculated in a way that favors those who can afford to manipulate the system.

David Zetland said...

@Robpublican -- yes, there will be corruption, but it's easier to spot it with property taxes...

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.