19 Jan 2017

Having an opinion doesn't mean you're right

H/T to enviroecon

Note to readers: Someone said it was "a little annoying" that I sometimes point out when I'm right ("like an economist would"), but I only do this because I am constantly checking on myself, to see if I'm understanding how current trends will turn out or if people will gravitate towards a position or belief. I make claims or predictions in the same way as you might place a bet or buy shares. Those actions force you to face black and white changes in your wallet, which tend to percolate up to the brain. I also, of course, try to admit when I am wrong (help me out if I don't!) or when I've changed my mind. This is not just a useful lesson in humility; it's a good way to help people see that you're willing to face facts.

I talk about being right or wrong in public (and on the blog) because my professional/public intellectual reputation depends on (a) being right, (b) learning from mistakes and (c) separating opinion from fact.

I'm curious how you deal with being right or wrong -- or do you never take a side that loses?


  1. good one, and i really like the take on the cartoon on the 9 and the 6. PH, who can also be annoying.

  2. In a not scientific world it is negligible if something is “true or false”. In your private area everything can be “true”. And no one has the right to correct this. - But where are the transition areas? You have five persons who build an airplane. When this is “science”, then they should know “the same” about building a plane. They should share the same source of knowledge. - But on the other hand, every statement about the world is a private perspective related to a bunch of “facts” someone has assembled.

    1. I think you're mixing up subjective and objective. For subjective, "true" is not the word to use, but "belief". For objective, read more here.


Spam will be deleted. Comments on older posts must be approved.
If you're having problems posting, email your comment to me