In order to form a more perfect union, I propose this:
Article 1: Don't do shit if you don't want to, not because it's wrong.
Article 2: Harming someone is not allowed because that person gets to decide what they want to do or have done to them (see Article 1).
Article 3: Damaging collective goods is not allowed because everyone gets to decide what they want to do or have done to them (see Article 2).
Did I miss anything?
Article 1: Don't do shit if you don't want to, not because it's wrong.
Article 2: Harming someone is not allowed because that person gets to decide what they want to do or have done to them (see Article 1).
Article 3: Damaging collective goods is not allowed because everyone gets to decide what they want to do or have done to them (see Article 2).
Did I miss anything?

1 comment:
define (limits to) collective goods...necessary? also must be clear that damaging private goods is covered by article 2
Post a Comment