- Implement freedom of expression, press, religion, business, etc.
- Reduce government (and the army) to the smallest possible size.
- Distribute as much wealth (esp. oil revenue) as possible to citizens.
- Use a broad tax base (e.g., property) without exemptions to fund a broad safety net (e.g., health) that's centrally funded but not centrally-operated.
Many of the problems in these countries can be traced to corruption related to capturing money; see, e.g., Iran, Iraq, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Congo, China, and others... Countries without strong central control -- India -- or resource pools -- Turkey -- tend to be less corrupt. Strong institutions (Norway) or lucky dictators (Singapore) can deliver results, but don't bet on it.
Bottom Line: The revolution will succeed when it makes the average person's life better, not if new crooks replace old crooks.
4 comments:
That's we need in the US.
Dr. Z.:
Introduce your readers to Desoto and his book The Mystery of Capital.
A legal system that ensured property and contract rights for regular folks, usually non-existent in poor countries, would go a long way to reducing the suffering in the Middle East.
In general those are good suggestions but I hate to hear the phrase "safety net" dragged into a conversation about how to craft a government. It's hard to argue against centrally funded basic services but in the US too many "safety nets" get used as hammocks.
A government should be crafted around the liberties that it protects, not the services that it provides.
Post a Comment