18 Nov 2010

Speed blogging

  • There are many financial, bureaucratic and informational questions casting doubt on the Delta project, now projected to cost $13 billion (for what benefit?)

  • An excellent post at Circle of Blue:
    As watergy flows decline and provision costs rise, utilities could – and in theory should – raise rates to balance out demand and supply. In practice, we voters ensure that they don’t. We only elect officials who keep rates – for residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural use – artificially low. It is hard to call them ‘cowards’ for declining to commit political suicide.
  • On a related note "...water policy in California is contradictory and vexing. Current policies encourage overconsumption and are unlikely to lead to long-term conservation because they fail to address the underlying economics and distorted incentives in the water market." Read this for more (I had a hand in it but forgot to post it when it was originally published).

  • The Economist on smart meters (and other sensors) for water- and other types of infrastructure.

  • Uh oh returns... "IPCC’s broader concern about the rapid loss of Himalayan glacier ice was correct."
H/T to WH

1 comment:

  1. Re: The Economist on smart meters (and other sensors) for water- and other types of infrastructure.

    There is that odd point, a tipping point if you will, between and betwixt George Orwell’s 1984 concept …..and any informational gathering point/source/exogenous end user.

    ReplyDelete

Read this first!

Make sure you copy your comment before submitting because sometimes the system will malfunction and you will lose your comment.

Spam will be deleted.

Comments on older posts must be approved (do not submit twice).

If you're having problems posting, email your comment to me