30 Nov 2009

Speed Blogging

  • Some clever researchers have found the source of arsenic contaminating well water in Bangladesh: human-built ponds. This is great news -- the first step to ending one of the greatest poisonings in history.

  • Put these guys in charge (they understand risk): "Citing fears of rising costs from climate change, insurance companies have begun changing the terms of their policies to encourage customers to act more green."

  • Hazardous waste in water and air, and how the government caused it. (22 pages -- take your time :)

  • A researcher has made a measuring device that indicates if industrial water is "clean enough," which promises to cut demand for water by up to 50 percent.

  • China is uprooting 330,000 people (and "paying" them) as it begins digging canals to bring water to Beijing (Delivery -- but not the end of their water problems -- in 2012) Sounds like they might like to do the Peripheral Canal!

  • Chris Brooks compares water use in New Mexico and Texas (same basin and dirt, different property rights) and finds [doc] that "significantly more water is pumped to irrigate lots more land under the rule of capture [TX] than under prior appropriation [NM]."

  • Field trials of (GMO'd) drought-tolerant maize have begun in South Africa. Speaking of that, here's a 3pp Economist article on Monsanto.
hattips to DL and DW


  1. Did you actually manage to read all 22 pages of the diatribe against sewage sludge? I couldn't make it through the first page. What a mess!

    You'll have to tell me if he ever gets around to saying what should be done in lieu of land application. Sh*t's gotta go somewhere.

  2. Wow-- very impressed at the insurance companies who are stepping up to the effort.

  3. Great stuff. I didn't read the whole poop, but I am interested in it as a problem (whoo that sounds bad), and I'm also going to poke you a bit and say that I'm not exactly sure government was the source of the, em, contamination. Tim's right, it's gotta go somewhere.

    If we were a government-less state, would we not have that pollution?

  4. @TiA -- nope. I saw what you saw and stopped. I warned you :)


Read this first!

Make sure you copy your comment before submitting because sometimes the system will malfunction and you will lose your comment.

Spam will be deleted.

Comments on older posts must be approved (do not submit twice).

If you're having problems posting, email your comment to me