For current residents of southern California, the CRA is a valuable source of water to their increasingly drought-prone region. Unfortunately, they may not understand the paradox of the CRA, i.e., how it probably did more to increase demand than increase supply. Put differently, the CRA was developed in a way that made today's shortages more likely.I have posted a draft here [pdf].
If you have the time (and inclination) to make any comments, I would be grateful.
I am already over my word limit (750), so I am looking for:
- errors and mischaracterizations
- missing information
- extra information
Please comment on this post (anonymously if you like) to save others the effort of pointing out the same mistakes. Shy people can email me.
Please also use the line numbers included in the pdf to make it easier for us to communicate.
Also note that the piece is due on June 16, so faster feedback is helpful.