I liked the film very much.
The documentary follows Charles Banda, the Malawian founder of Freshwater Project, as he pushes forward his shoestring operation to drill wells in villages that lack access to water. (Girls and women walk 5 km to get 20 liters of dirty water that they carry back on their heads.)
FWP has been around for about 10 years and has "brought water" to about 600,000 Malawians. Even assuming that FWP spent their current budget ($70,000/year) in each of these years, it's a remarkable achievement that they have managed to INSTALL water supplies for just over $1/person. (All of these numbers come from the movie, so I am taking them as accurate.)
Here are a few things I liked about FWP:
- Banda targets those "in need" who cannot afford water. This is a subjective rule, but he -- as a local -- is a better judge (than foreigners) of who "needs" water.
- Villagers MUST contribute sweat equity and materials (sand, bricks, etc.) to the projects, so they see the projects as their own.
- Banda makes a VERY good point that hardly any MDGs (gender equality, education, etc.) can be reached without water. In economic terms, water is necessary but not sufficient for development
- When water sources are clean, it's not necessary to boil water before drinking. Lower demand for firewood means that trees and scrub stay in place. When it rains, there is less run off (because the roots stop flows) and more water filters into groundwater, increasing supply to the wells.
If we were rich and we had money, the government would have come to assist us, but we are poor.See any parallels with AIG, subprime housing, etc?
I recommend this film to people who want to learn (or teach others) about water in the developing world. (I saw the 45-minute version, which has more on Banda. There's also a 28-minute version.)
Banda's Bottom Line: "If he has no water and needs water, then he drinks death."