Although the US Congress is famous for its 90 percent-plus reelection rate (figure), water directors have even higher success rates -- because they rarely face opposition.
So how does a new director replace an old director? The old directors choose the new director, who steps in when the incumbent resigns. That new director then runs as an "incumbent" in the next election -- and rarely faces opposition.
Did you notice what a sweetheart deal that is? Yep -- Board members appoint their replacements. That's the way things work in Russia -- not in a democracy.
How are the AV directors reacting to the challenge? They are not happy:
Water agency board members in 1997 appointed Weisenberger to fill the vacated seat of Duard Jackson, a retired California State University, Los Angeles professor who moved out of the area. Since being appointed to the board, Weisenberger, a 52-year-old Antelope Valley College agriculture and landscape professor from Lancaster, has run unopposed.I don't know about you, but I thought that elections are SUPPOSED to be political. Too bad these guys are going to face a POLITICAL challenge. After all, it may interfere with business as usual. /sarcasm
In fact, director Dave Rizzo, also up for re-election, considered Weisenberger to be lucky in the 1998, 2000 and 2004 elections for not having to campaign.
"Now he has to earn his position like everyone else," Rizzo said with a smile, adding that he was kidding.
But neither Rizzo nor Weisenberger is laughing too hard. They believe a politically motivated strategy is behind an effort to unseat them and longtime board member George Lane, who has served as a board director since 1977.
Bottom Line: Competition is good. (And no, I don't care if the challengers want to skewer and roast Bambi alive -- all politicians should earn their seats.)